(03-23-2020, 12:15 AM)iHaunting Raven Wrote:

(03-22-2020, 06:07 PM)JackCity Wrote: You are aware I'm good friends with both of those guys right? How exactly would I know that?

Again, Clarks deal doesn't mean teams don't want to pay Yannick, in the same way that the Redskins not wanting to pay and trade doesn't meant others don't. Singular data points being used as the fields stance isn't wise, so again I'd ask where's your evidence that teams currently just straight up don't want to give him a big deal, independent of the picks they'd also give him. You mentioned it above but haven't seen any proof

---

Yannicks a better pure pass rusher, Clowneys more versatile and better overall

Teams don't wanna pay Yannick what he wants, it's been reported.
You really understand what you are saying? because it doesn't make any sense. Why? because the Chiefs clearly thought highly of Clark enough to give good compensation and still give him a big contract, how many times that doesn't happen when teams make trades?. If a team really believes in Yannick they wouldn't hesitate to do what they must to get him.
You are just being an [BLEEP] now, I asked for proof for what you say because how you said it, not because I wanted to be the [BLEEP], but hey want me to be? I can. You have no real evidence to backup what you are claiming, if your proof is the twitter of some guy just LOL, especially since there are tweets that say otherwise, bring evidence from an official source and I'll believe you, I'll wait.

It should be clear by now that teams don't value Yannick as much as you think, because he is clearly not an elite rusher, not even top 10.

Wanna keep going? be my guest but don't expect me to reply until you bring real evidence from an official source.

1) Teams not wanting to pay Yannick exactly what he wants and give picks is not the same as teams not wanting to give him a big contract

2) The chiefs paying way too much for Clark (worked out anyway) does not mean thats how everyone will operate, there are 31 other teams. So saying "but the chiefs did this" doesn't actually contribute anything to how other teams may view Yannick currently (but you know that) 

3) And the source I provided is the only guy with actual sources in the Jags front office , unless you have a better one? So yeah im good going off his info, again, unless you can provide a more accurate source of Jags news? 

4) You can post your evidence any time you want. Still haven't actually seen anyone from you, but thats par for the course

---