<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I been understood he thinks differently from me, but when he categorized (all) Black people as the problem with Black America, the question of me asking him what skin color he was was a challenge to him on what he describes as the "problem with Black America".


<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"> 

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">He chose to point fingers at Black America, but yet when pressed with what can he do to help, he offered nothing stating he dosent want to help which at the end of the day is his choice, but he comes across as a hypocrite which is sad."


<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"> 

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">You said when he categorized it, you then asked him the question.  That isn't true if you were merely doing it from a thread way back.  Again, you said you questioned him when he categorized black people as the problem with black america.  Which would mean right after.  And it happened before.  I'm not sure what Richard Sherman thread you are referring to, but the one in regards to race that I could find, Tommy had two posts "Why? Because he's passionate? LOL. He's not a thug. You want to know what a thug is? Move to Chicago." and "
Seems like jealousy to me."

---