Quote:JFC, if your response is I disagree without explaining why you disagree with his post/point/argument than you are ignoring his post.  He took time to respond to you, gave you a well thought out response, backed it up with numbers, etc...  Its is okay to disagree.  But seems weak to not even give the poster the time of day when they responded to your post and just say, well that is how I feel.  Okay, explain.  Why do you feel his argument has no relevance to the minority coaching argument?  Why do the odds, which he presented, not matter?  What is even worse is you state you saw no value (again completely dismissing his post) while never explaining why it has no value in the argument.

 

It's really bizarre you want me to keep going around in circles repeating the same thing over and over again.

 

He responded to my quote that wasn't even intended for him with an answer that didn't relate to my point at hand which is something you and he desperately equate in your own minds.

 

You and other people cant seem to grasp the simple concept that we are viewing this from two totally different angles. I realize that, but you have a serious problem with it. 

 

There is nothing else to squeeze out of this discussion as well, but you and the message board experts will keep is going with retread drivel.

 

*yawn*

---