Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Wash’s innovative defense

#37
(This post was last modified: 09-25-2020, 03:26 PM by NeptuneBeachBum.)

(09-25-2020, 03:02 PM)knarnn Wrote:
(09-25-2020, 02:52 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote:
This is not a zone blitz, its only a 3-man rush.
This is a red zone Cover 2 with a DT peeling off into coverage.  They were in a 3x1 formation with the back offset to the weak side.  The weak corner does not allow an outside release, passes the inside route to the safety, and would be responsible for Henry in the flat.  Jack faked like he was blitzing and dropped to to hook-curl zone, but he was looking at the back in the flat (who the corner would have had) when he should have been expecting a crosser from the the trips side.  The safety had the WR on the inside route.  That was Jack's play to make, but he had his eyes in the wrong place and did not follow his keys properly.  Dropping the DT here was to help re-route any crossing routes (which he did... though it could have been more effective), take away another potential throwing lane, or fill a gap if the QB started to scramble towards the end zone.

On 3rd and goal from the 5, I have no problem with this play call... its solid.  Especially against a QB like Tannehill.  But it was poorly executed, particularly by Jack.  Jack is a very athletic player, but tends to make mental errors like this throughout the game and it holds him back from being elite.  Poz would have made this play.  Now if you want to argue "well that is coaching because Jack made a mistake"... I'm with you.  But the scheme here is fine.

That’s what I said.

It’s a bad play design. You would normally drop a DT with QB spy responsibility on a zone blitz. The hope is to confuse the QB enough to allow the blitzer to get there. Dropping an extra lineman in a cover 2 scheme is ineffective there. Tannehill had all day to make a decision and waited until his man came free inbetween zones easily crossing Taven.

I don't know what play you're watching.  We actually had decent edge pressure on the weak side (for a change) but Tannehill threw the ball in about 2.5 seconds.  We don't get to the QB in 2.5 seconds even when we blitz.  The play was poorly executed by Jack... his eyes were in the wrong spot.  The design and call were good... the execution by Jack was not.  If you don't understand that, you're just being emotional and nothing I can tell you will help you get it. But that's fine.
This is a results-oriented business.  There are no trophies or titles given for "moral victories" or for "winning the draft".  Our record with DC is 37-86.  6-10 is our 2nd best season in 8 years of Caldwell leadership.  These are the FACTS.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-21-2020, 12:54 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by CanDoBetter - 09-21-2020, 02:40 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by flsprtsgod - 09-21-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by JaG4LyFe - 09-21-2020, 03:38 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Mowerguy - 09-21-2020, 04:07 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by p_rushing - 09-21-2020, 07:07 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by HURRICANE!!! - 09-21-2020, 07:33 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by rhanna2 - 09-21-2020, 08:24 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by p_rushing - 09-21-2020, 09:28 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by surfon - 09-21-2020, 10:03 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by JaguarJosh2 - 09-22-2020, 02:55 AM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by surfon - 09-23-2020, 12:51 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Kane - 09-23-2020, 03:13 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Kane - 09-23-2020, 09:56 AM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by p_rushing - 09-23-2020, 01:56 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by JaG4LyFe - 09-24-2020, 02:25 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 02:01 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 03:02 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by NeptuneBeachBum - 09-25-2020, 03:24 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 03:28 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 03:47 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 04:25 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by flsprtsgod - 09-25-2020, 04:03 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by flsprtsgod - 09-25-2020, 04:22 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by surfon - 09-25-2020, 01:30 AM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 01:38 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Jagsfan32277 - 09-25-2020, 02:41 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Dimson - 09-25-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Dimson - 09-25-2020, 03:03 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by CanDoBetter - 09-25-2020, 03:08 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Dimson - 09-25-2020, 03:09 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Kane - 09-25-2020, 03:29 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by Cleatwood - 09-25-2020, 03:36 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by JAGFAN4EVER! - 09-25-2020, 03:29 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by p_rushing - 09-25-2020, 04:41 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 04:49 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by p_rushing - 09-25-2020, 05:04 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 05:42 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 05:56 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 06:12 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 06:45 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by knarnn - 09-25-2020, 08:06 PM
RE: Wash’s innovative defense - by p_rushing - 09-26-2020, 02:03 AM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!