(09-25-2020, 04:52 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote:

(09-25-2020, 04:41 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Please go back and watch that play again. Jack had no chance because of the stupid zone coverage.

Jack had to stay in that space. If Jack comes up to stop the TE, the WR coming over the middle in the end zone is open. If Jack comes up, the RB is wide open in the flat because the CB couldn't come up quickly. Jack stayed back in his zone to take away those 2 easy TDs but couldn't come up quick enough for the tackle.

It wasn't his fault, the play was setup to fail 3 ways.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

You're wrong.  Its Football 101 red zone Cover 2:  The safety has the WR on an inside route.  The CB has the RB in the flat after he forces inside release of WR (granted, he played it poorly).  The weakside hook-curl player (Jack) needs to recognize the crosser.  He didn't even look.  That's on him.  Football 101 man.

---

(09-25-2020, 04:49 PM)knarnn Wrote: ^^^

Someone gets it

^^^  Someone doesn't.

I get what is supposed to happen when you draw the play up in your mind. Then there is the real world and what happens on the play never matches what you drew up.

The CB has to stay with the WR into the end zone because the safety can't get out there quick enough, it's not humanly possible without abandoning the middle of the field. Jack saw the crosser but can't come up until after the ball is thrown.

The playcall was going to be beat no matter what the players did. Even if they played it exactly like Wash wanted them to, it still gets beat 1 of 3 ways and that doesn't even mention what was happening on the right side of the play.

The defense is design to sit back and what for the other team to make a mistake without giving up a big play. Without pressure mistakes do not happen. The defensive scheme is garbage.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

---