(10-20-2020, 02:18 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-20-2020, 12:16 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: You truly will go to any length to defend the worst positions. If he’s a high profile lawyer, he’s going to record his conversations. If your Hunter Biden’s attorney, you DO NOT call and ask for the specific computer that this high profile lawyer says contains incriminating evidence of your client unless you’re telling them that the computer and it’s contents belong to your client. 

If Hunter Biden wanted to handle this correctly, he’d contact local or federal law enforcement and ask them to investigate whatever it is that he would blame for being responsible for the contents of that laptop. I imagine, however, that the FBI already knows what’s on the laptop since the child pornography investigator already handled the laptop. These types of investigators also make physical copies of the contents. 

Edit: Hunter Biden's attorneys didn't call Giuliani for the hard drive. They called and emailed the computer store that he gave the laptop. Giuliani said that the lawyer's specifically asked for Hunter Biden's laptop.

I’d love to hear why you think the FBI investigated the child-sniffer’s son for child pornography too.

Unless there is a recording of the call, we don't know what was said.
Unless there is metadata for the call, we don't even know that the call was placed.
None of this is any more credible than Some Dude On Twitter.
Take the politics out of it.  Imagine someone said something about Josh Allen wanting out of Jacksonville on some social media site.  That would upset you.  You might want to share it.  A lot of people might share it.  But would anyone know it was more than just something someone made up?

(10-20-2020, 02:23 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I guess we could use the same logic to undermine the quid pro quo impeachment. Too bad you can't retract your Biden vote.