(10-22-2020, 08:20 AM)mikesez Wrote: You are really bad at this.

I'll take this as a compliment, coming from you. 

All of these issues are subjective without a confession or video evidence. The question is whether or not one is willing to be objective about the way they approach the evidence. You're not. We've been through the whole impeachment argument, ad nauseum. I am referring to the evidence that kicked off the investigations leading to Trump's impeachment. A whistleblower listened to a phone conversation and leaked his version of it to the press. Even though his version was more elaborate than the redacted version, you choose to believe his version, not the released transcript. The basis for the impeachment was a third party suggesting Trump was doing this for personal gain. That is the evidence to which I am referring. 

With Biden, you have a laptop that certainly belongs to Hunter. It could have been tampered with, but we don't know that, and there is zero evidence to suggest this is the case. There has been no denial by the Biden camp, and the only thing we have on record is Biden's lawyer calling the shop to try to retrieve it. We have not one, but two counts of shady business dealings, where it appears the Big Man leveraged his power for financial gain. Now questions need to be asked to get to the bottom of this, and the MSM is not doing it's job. I am not saying Joe Biden is guilty of anything. It certainly looks that way, if any of this can be believed, but we need actual journalists asking questions and that's not happening. You can't say the same about Trump.

---