(11-18-2020, 02:16 AM)Minshew Mania Wrote: Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

This is such a simple-minded argument that has already been repeatedly debunked and explained.  You can't prove electoral fraud from a time-series analysis of voter tabulation anomalies.  It amazes me that anyone with half a brain would look at this and not understand what it is; but clearly we are dealing with morons, so let's help them out.

Pennsylvania's and Georgia's procedures for vote counting were to tally the mail-in ballots after the in-person vote.  Mail-in votes were strongly preferred by Democrats; logic would dictate that states and counties who vote more Democratic would have more mail-in votes.  Therefore, in states where the mail-in vote was not being counted early, in-person voting showed big leads for Republicans.  Once the mail-in votes were counted, the gap rapidly closed.  Your "statistical anomalies" were the exact opposite in states where the mail-in vote was counted early (see Arizona and Ohio).  In those states, Democrats jumped out to huge leads early but when in-person voting tabulation caught up to the mail-in vote, Republicans quickly closed the gap.  These "statistical anomalies" are not difficult to understand; they are a product of state and county procedures where votes were not counted in a way where they would be equally distributed with the final results.

Statistical anomalies, particularly in time-series analysis 100% influenced by counting procedures differentiated between state and/or county, are just plain stupid to make any attempt to display voter fraud.  It's embarrassingly poor and child-like logic.  To prove fraud, you need to show illegal voters and/or that votes were changed.  The electoral commissions of Georgia and Michigan both stated there is absolutely no evidence of technological voter fraud (which would leave a cyber footprint) or any significant level of any type voter fraud, whatsoever.  Every court in the land is tossing out Trump's unsubstantiated claims.  Even Trump's own hand-picked cybersecurity expert (Christopher Krebs) debunked any claims of fraudulent election activity based on computer software or technology...so obviously, Trump fired him yesterday.

Long-analysis shortened:  You are clueless; not only about proving election fraud, but also thinking Minshew in a franchise QB.

---

(11-18-2020, 08:12 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

You can't be this stupid; you must be intentionally trying to be obtuse on this.  So I will give you one free pass on this ridiculous comment.  

---