http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...c.html?m=1

---

https://www.scribd.com/document/48457978...sis-Report

The primary takeaway is that ALL of these experts came to the same conclusinos:

1) There are some major statistical aberrations in the PA voting records, that are extremely unlikely to occur in a normal (i.e. un-manipulated) setting.

2) The anomalies almost exclusively happened with the Biden votes. Time and again, using a variety of techniques, the TRump votes looked statistically normal.

3) Eleven (out of 67) Pennsylvania counties stood out from all the rest. These counties showed distinctive signs of voting abnormalities - again, all for Biden.

4) The total number of suspicious votes in these counties is 300,000± - which greatly exceeds the rported margin of Biden votes over Trump. (We don't know how many of these are artificial Biden votes, or votes switches from Trump to Biden.)

5) These statistical analyses do no prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens voted.

---

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

---

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

---

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

States have specific dates when they certify the election results.  

You know you could have just googled it but here is a link

---

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

This is such a simple-minded argument that has already been repeatedly debunked and explained.  You can't prove electoral fraud from a time-series analysis of voter tabulation anomalies.  It amazes me that anyone with half a brain would look at this and not understand what it is; but clearly we are dealing with morons, so let's help them out.

Pennsylvania's and Georgia's procedures for vote counting were to tally the mail-in ballots after the in-person vote.  Mail-in votes were strongly preferred by Democrats; logic would dictate that states and counties who vote more Democratic would have more mail-in votes.  Therefore, in states where the mail-in vote was not being counted early, in-person voting showed big leads for Republicans.  Once the mail-in votes were counted, the gap rapidly closed.  Your "statistical anomalies" were the exact opposite in states where the mail-in vote was counted early (see Arizona and Ohio).  In those states, Democrats jumped out to huge leads early but when in-person voting tabulation caught up to the mail-in vote, Republicans quickly closed the gap.  These "statistical anomalies" are not difficult to understand; they are a product of state and county procedures where votes were not counted in a way where they would be equally distributed with the final results.

Statistical anomalies, particularly in time-series analysis 100% influenced by counting procedures differentiated between state and/or county, are just plain stupid to make any attempt to display voter fraud.  It's embarrassingly poor and child-like logic.  To prove fraud, you need to show illegal voters and/or that votes were changed.  The electoral commissions of Georgia and Michigan both stated there is absolutely no evidence of technological voter fraud (which would leave a cyber footprint) or any significant level of any type voter fraud, whatsoever.  Every court in the land is tossing out Trump's unsubstantiated claims.  Even Trump's own hand-picked cybersecurity expert (Christopher Krebs) debunked any claims of fraudulent election activity based on computer software or technology...so obviously, Trump fired him yesterday.

Long-analysis shortened:  You are clueless; not only about proving election fraud, but also thinking Minshew in a franchise QB.

---

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

You can't be this stupid; you must be intentionally trying to be obtuse on this.  So I will give you one free pass on this ridiculous comment.  

---

This is a results-oriented business.  There are no trophies or titles given for "moral victories" or for "winning the draft".  Our record with DC is 37-86.  6-10 is our 2nd best season in 8 years of Caldwell leadership.  These are the FACTS.

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

This is such a simple-minded argument that has already been repeatedly debunked and explained.  You can't prove electoral fraud from a time-series analysis of voter tabulation anomalies.  It amazes me that anyone with half a brain would look at this and not understand what it is; but clearly we are dealing with morons, so let's help them out.

Pennsylvania's and Georgia's procedures for vote counting were to tally the mail-in ballots after the in-person vote.  Mail-in votes were strongly preferred by Democrats; logic would dictate that states and counties who vote more Democratic would have more mail-in votes.  Therefore, in states where the mail-in vote was not being counted early, in-person voting showed big leads for Republicans.  Once the mail-in votes were counted, the gap rapidly closed.  Your "statistical anomalies" were the exact opposite in states where the mail-in vote was counted early (see Arizona and Ohio).  In those states, Democrats jumped out to huge leads early but when in-person voting tabulation caught up to the mail-in vote, Republicans quickly closed the gap.  These "statistical anomalies" are not difficult to understand; they are a product of state and county procedures where votes were not counted in a way where they would be equally distributed with the final results.

Statistical anomalies, particularly in time-series analysis 100% influenced by counting procedures differentiated between state and/or county, are just plain stupid to make any attempt to display voter fraud.  It's embarrassingly poor and child-like logic.  To prove fraud, you need to show illegal voters and/or that votes were changed.  The electoral commissions of Georgia and Michigan both stated there is absolutely no evidence of technological voter fraud (which would leave a cyber footprint) or any significant level of any type voter fraud, whatsoever.  Every court in the land is tossing out Trump's unsubstantiated claims.  Even Trump's own hand-picked cybersecurity expert (Christopher Krebs) debunked any claims of fraudulent election activity based on computer software or technology...so obviously, Trump fired him yesterday.

Long-analysis shortened:  You are clueless; not only about proving election fraud, but also thinking Minshew in a franchise QB.

---

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

You can't be this stupid; you must be intentionally trying to be obtuse on this.  So I will give you one free pass on this ridiculous comment.  

You're going to need a lot more free passes.

---

Neptune you don't need to keep calling people stupid. We are here to debate politics

---

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

He doesn't even have to prove it happened with the software being designed to do it and not leave a trace. They have developers working with them. It may take him blowing up the dems and rinos, I don't know if he is willing to do that though. They have enough evidence from all the faked and impossible data happening after the counting was paused.

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

Yep they can certify at any point. They generally have to by certain dates. With MI before threatened to certify or else, I think some people don't want to end up in jail. In Detroit, +70% of the precincts have more votes than people signing the log. How can anyone certify the election?

Yep she doesn't think they will win or there wouldn't be a need to keep her seat.

---

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

He doesn't even have to prove it happened with the software being designed to do it and not leave a trace. They have developers working with them. It may take him blowing up the dems and rinos, I don't know if he is willing to do that though. They have enough evidence from all the faked and impossible data happening after the counting was paused.

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

Yep they can certify at any point. They generally have to by certain dates. With MI before threatened to certify or else, I think some people don't want to end up in jail. In Detroit, +70% of the precincts have more votes than people signing the log. How can anyone certify the election?

Yep she doesn't think they will win or there wouldn't be a need to keep her seat.

Almost every ballot in GA, if not every single one, was paper. As I understand, they're doing a hand recount now.
If the computer counted the pieces of paper wrong, we will know soon.
I don't know about PA.  I don't think PA is doing a hand recount.

---

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

He doesn't even have to prove it happened with the software being designed to do it and not leave a trace. They have developers working with them. It may take him blowing up the dems and rinos, I don't know if he is willing to do that though. They have enough evidence from all the faked and impossible data happening after the counting was paused.

Why havent any states certified the election and why hasn't Kamala vacated her Senste seat if this is in the bag?

Yep they can certify at any point. They generally have to by certain dates. With MI before threatened to certify or else, I think some people don't want to end up in jail. In Detroit, +70% of the precincts have more votes than people signing the log. How can anyone certify the election?

Yep she doesn't think they will win or there wouldn't be a need to keep her seat.

The problem in Michigan is that the letter of the law is all four people agreeing to an exact number of votes.

As you correctly point out, there are discrepancies in some precincts in Michigan.

But you can be certain that Biden got no less votes than his current total minus the number of discrepancies.

And he got no more votes than his current total plus the number of discrepancies.

It's still certain that he's the winner, because the discrepancies are small.  We just don't have the exact number.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

He doesn't even have to prove it happened with the software being designed to do it and not leave a trace. They have developers working with them. It may take him blowing up the dems and rinos, I don't know if he is willing to do that though. They have enough evidence from all the faked and impossible data happening after the counting was paused.


Yep they can certify at any point. They generally have to by certain dates. With MI before threatened to certify or else, I think some people don't want to end up in jail. In Detroit, +70% of the precincts have more votes than people signing the log. How can anyone certify the election?

Yep she doesn't think they will win or there wouldn't be a need to keep her seat.

Almost every ballot in GA, if not every single one, was paper. As I understand, they're doing a hand recount now.
If the computer counted the pieces of paper wrong, we will know soon.
I don't know about PA.  I don't think PA is doing a hand recount.

Georgia doesn't do paper ballots. At least around Atlanta every is on computers. You get a credit card device and put it into the machine and vote. Then you take it out and hand it to them. They then are supposed to have a backup.

They may have a paper backup stored somewhere in the computer, but there is no paper ballot printed at time of voting.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

---

Almost every ballot in GA, if not every single one, was paper. As I understand, they're doing a hand recount now.
If the computer counted the pieces of paper wrong, we will know soon.
I don't know about PA.  I don't think PA is doing a hand recount.

Georgia doesn't do paper ballots. At least around Atlanta every is on computers. You get a credit card device and put it into the machine and vote. Then you take it out and hand it to them. They then are supposed to have a backup.

They may have a paper backup stored somewhere in the computer, but there is no paper ballot printed at time of voting.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

According to verified voting, almost all of Georgia uses what they call a ballot marking device where a paper inside the machine is marked while you are voting.  
The only hitch is that the machine could have been hacked such that the display screen says one thing, but the printout, that the voter does not get to read at the time, says something else. This seems extremely unlikely, but, a paper that the voter himself actually marks would obviously be better.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

I don't know what to think of this. As a big Jo Jorgenson supporter, I'm afraid Trump is trying to end democracy, and Biden is going to steal my guns!!

Trump is unhinged right now though, almost makes me excited for President Harris in a year!

---

I don't know what to think of this. As a big Jo Jorgenson supporter, I'm afraid Trump is trying to end democracy, and Biden is going to steal my guns!!

Trump is unhinged right now though, almost makes me excited for President Harris in a year!

All right, which one of you jack [BLEEP] is this alt?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I don't know what to think of this. As a big Jo Jorgenson supporter, I'm afraid Trump is trying to end democracy, and Biden is going to steal my guns!!

Trump is unhinged right now though, almost makes me excited for President Harris in a year!

That's funny.  Thanks.

---

I don't know what to think of this. As a big Jo Jorgenson supporter, I'm afraid Trump is trying to end democracy, and Biden is going to steal my guns!!

Trump is unhinged right now though, almost makes me excited for President Harris in a year!

All right, which one of you jack [BLEEP] is this alt?

What do you mean?

The Jaguars stellar on-field play is constantly drawing new members to the board whom begin their journey posting in the political forum.

---

Neptune you don't need to keep calling people stupid. We are here to debate politics

You're right... I was just trying to be "presidential".  I'll do better.  

---

This is a results-oriented business.  There are no trophies or titles given for "moral victories" or for "winning the draft".  Our record with DC is 37-86.  6-10 is our 2nd best season in 8 years of Caldwell leadership.  These are the FACTS.

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

.... #realtalk

---

Also see: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11...matic.html


If Trump can't win this election with all of this, plus whistle blowers, plus the powers available to him as the President of the United States of America, he was never going to save the Republic anyway. Might as well jump off one of Jacksonville's fine bridges if that is the case.

You're halfway to an epiphany.
Maybe two or maybe four years from now, as you realize that they're still letting anyone run for office who wants to, and still letting you vote for whoever you want, you will get the rest of the epiphany, that the republic was never in any real danger in the first place. The words of Franklin Delano Roosevelt may come to mind, "the only thing we had to fear in 2016 was fear itself."

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You should really get your parents money back for sending you to both of those high end High schools you attended at the same time.

---

You should really get your parents money back for sending you to both of those high end High schools you attended at the same time.

You must be new to the area. They're both totally free!

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.