Quote:I'm of the opinion that none of those four are long-term answers at the QB position. From that perspective, it seems to me that changing out Henne with any of them is simply change for change's sake; something I do not think has any merit.

 

Henne had bad games, and he's probably going to have a few more but I'm willing to let him continue on here until a better, long-term answer is found.

 

I agree with you. 

 

In my opinion, if a team can rush the passer using only their front four, like Seattle did in the Super Bowl, that's almost as good as having a franchise quarterback.    I don't think Russell Wilson is an elite quarterback at all.  He has a great defense and running game.  

 

Not that I think he's the long term solution, but I personally think Chad Henne can win a lot of games if we give him a solid defense and running game.  There's more than one way to build a great team, and if you can't get a franchise QB, you have to avail yourself of what presents itself. 

---