(12-14-2020, 12:52 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(12-14-2020, 12:18 PM)Kane Wrote: Was not a great night for Trask, though if you want to be objective, those INTs weren't exactly just bad throws/plays by him. Double doink INT near the sideline especially.

I'm not gonna make excuses for him though, probably his worst game at the worst possible time.
Mostly though I blame Dan Mullen, dude is too cocky for his own good. Not playing Pitts to rest him for Bama was stupid, imo. Not taking points early when in the RZ.

UF's defense is still trash so I never gave them much of a chance in the SECCG anyway.

But, just like everyone wants to say that Fields one bad game against IU shouldn't counter all the good I don't think that LSU game should negate all the good Trask has done.
My opinion is pretty much still the same, late first early second round QB. Not going to come in and be anyone's savior QB but if he lands with a Nola or New England I think he'll do very well.

I agree.

My whole point is that one game shouldn’t completely change the outlook on a player. Fields bad game shouldn’t change his entire body of work.

I was just pointing out the hypocrisy in all of it. If you liked Trask before the bad LSU game, you should still like him today.

I have the same opinion of Trask now, that I had before his bad game. I think he has the potential to be a good NFL QB, but it's gonna take time with him. Who ever drafts him is gonna need patience. He's not a plug and play QB. He's more on the developmental side. 

The same goes for Fields. I didn't like him before his bad game against Indiana and I still don't like him. I don't see an NFL QB when I watch him play and I've seen all of his games. If he wasn't so athletic, there is no way he'd be considered a first round pick.

---