(02-18-2021, 09:34 AM)RicoTx Wrote:

(02-17-2021, 11:02 PM)Tank Commander Wrote: You could literarily make your argument for every signal QB.  Measurablesables don't matter, harumph!

And your examples are flawed anyway since Manning hit alot of the measurables with elite size (for the 1990s) and above average arm strength, could make all the throws.  Not sure why you are using a once in a life time QB prospect like Peyton as an example of an underdog. lol.

Brady has above average height, the rest, well everyone missed on.  He's a Joe Montana like freak. But he was good right away.  Wasn't losing and racking up garbage stats on losing teams like Scott Mitchell and Watson.

Blah, blah, blah.  It took you that long to come up with that [BLEEP] analyis.  You're quoting speed for a quarterback.  It's really, really, dumb.

It's not "dumb". Lamar Jackson has 4.2 speed.  Makes a big difference when a QB has 4.4 or below speed.

With Watson, nothing really stands out about him except his wingspan (which might be great in basketball but not for an NFL QB)

Not sure where the love fest for Watson is coming from. I think he's a solid QB but not a top 5 generational talent. Certainly wouldn't give up the farm to get him.

---