(02-19-2021, 11:06 AM)Tank Commander Wrote:

(02-19-2021, 09:45 AM)Mikey Wrote: Calling BS on this. Go back through the thread. Your very first post dropped his 40 time, unsolicited. It's your pet stat, and you're unwilling to detach from it, regardless of its irrelevance.

I am not drafting or trading for any QB based on a 40 time. If that's your biggest critique of a QB, that's not a very convincing argument.

Please show me a QB who wins while putting up garbage time stats.

Wrong.

My "Pet stat" is 3 Cone.

40 times and mobility are important. That's the reality of the dual threat QB. You can't put your blinders on and say that the dual threat QB doesn't have it's place in the NFL as Steve Young, Mike Vick, Lamar Jackson have shown. It's one factor that you have to consider within the totality of factors.

Watson was sacked 49 times this year.  62 in 2018.
This indicates a guy who isn't fast enough or agile enough to avoid the rush and/or holds on to the ball too long and doesn't have great pro style pocket passer awareness.

Like I said from the beginning, I don't think Watson is a bad QB, I think he's good but to me he is not an elite, generational, HOF type QB.
And I would not trade 3 #1s and two starters for such a QB.

---

(02-19-2021, 11:03 AM)RicoTx Wrote: Good God.  Here you go again just changing parameters and making [BLEEP] up, that I never once implied, to support whatever point you're trying to make.

I thought you said he was an elite QB, Top 5, worthy of having the farm traded for?

Is this incorrect?