Worst case scenario at 25

Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Worst case scenario at 25

Bullseye
Guy who posts a lot
Posts: 16,905
Threads: 1,188
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 421

#18

04-09-2021, 11:30 PM

(04-09-2021, 11:01 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:
(04-09-2021, 10:59 PM)JagswinJagswin Wrote: Since they did nothing in FA to help the OL, they have to get someone in to help this OL. If they don't, none of these other picks will matter this year or until they do.

Agreed.

To me, barring a most unusual circumstance where none of the BAPs at their picks are linemen, I see no excuse for the team to not address the area at least once in ten picks.

Even though Meyer said it wasn't a blow it up situation on the OL, the need for quality depth necessitates OL, if nothing else.

If we had a slew of injuries along the OL, as the roster is currently, there is no way we could protect TL.

Truth is, we need to upgrade the T spots. But to not address OL at all this offseason would be a most egregious negligence.

Were there such a thing as malpractice in football GM circles, that would be it.

Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!

Messages In This Thread

Worst case scenario at 25 - by Dimson - 04-09-2021, 02:40 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Upper - 04-09-2021, 02:44 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by The Real Marty - 04-09-2021, 02:47 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by jaglou53 - 04-09-2021, 03:06 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Eric1 - 04-10-2021, 01:15 AM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Dimson - 04-09-2021, 02:56 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-09-2021, 04:02 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Bullseye - 04-09-2021, 04:12 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Upper - 04-09-2021, 04:17 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-09-2021, 05:17 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by flgatorsandjags - 04-09-2021, 06:33 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Mikey - 04-09-2021, 04:51 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by jaglou53 - 04-09-2021, 06:26 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Upper - 04-09-2021, 06:49 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-09-2021, 08:39 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Upper - 04-09-2021, 09:48 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by JagswinJagswin - 04-09-2021, 10:59 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-09-2021, 11:01 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Bullseye - 04-09-2021, 11:30 PM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by flgatorsandjags - 04-10-2021, 12:02 AM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by Bullseye - 04-10-2021, 11:40 AM

RE: Worst case scenario at 25 - by The Real Marty - 04-11-2021, 06:01 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.