(04-22-2021, 04:31 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(04-22-2021, 04:10 PM)Mikey Wrote: No way in poop they try to jump that high.

I'm thinking the jump will be in the 18-20 range for an OT, either Darrisaw, Jenkins or Eichenburg if they are dead set on getting a tackle.

---

ahahahahahahah ain't no way that is enough for ATL to take that deal. or if they do, the GM is likely fired before the end of April.

I seriously doubt we would of tagged Cam if we wanted to trade up for a tackle.

I seriously doubt we would of [sic] tagged Cam if we thought he was the future of the position.

In the other thread, debate has been over the room v. Urban in terms of need v. value. If someone like Darrisaw slips to 18, the value may present itself. Remember we darfted Joeckel while we still had Monroe under contract. The darft is never about today. If you make it about today, it will bite you in the pants two years from now.

I am not advocating a trade up for anyone. The question was who do you think they would jump for?  In all honesty, the most plausible (while not necessarily wise) jump might be to grab Barmore, if they think he is head and shoulders above the rest of the DT class, and they suspect someone in the second half of the darft is going to grab him. Again, I don't advocate the jump, but it's one I could see them making.

---

(04-22-2021, 06:57 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(04-22-2021, 10:13 AM)HolsterHusto Wrote: They did give the parameters, it was 1.25, 2.33, and 3.65 for 1.4.

I am positive that wouldn’t be enough though.

I missed that. There's no way that would do it though. It would cost us another high draft pick. Probably a 2022 first rounder.

---

(04-22-2021, 04:31 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: I seriously doubt we would of tagged Cam if we wanted to trade up for a tackle.

We tagged Cam for one reason, desperation. The free agent LT market was thin and the top LT's in the draft (Sewell, Slater and Darrisaw) will be long gone by the time we pick. There is no way any reasonable person would have tagged him based upon his past performance. It was completely out of desperation.

I think you mean "would of tagged him"  

I agree completely, it was a (relatively) affordable way to avoid a green QB starting with a green OT blocking his blindside, whether that was a rookie or an FA tackle.

---