(05-05-2021, 05:56 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(05-05-2021, 03:28 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: No it doesn't. It involves paying people a decent amount of money and promising them protection from scrutiny. There are often incidents in our history that were shady. As long as people go more than a year without talking, and the media doesn't bring it up, no one will care about it. That's a fact. So, let's get to the next part.

None of these charges have been refuted. The numbers do not make sense. They don't add up. I'm not howling at the moon here. Show me how these numbers make sense without shenanigans. I'll give you 2 out of the gate: Explain the rejection rates of ballots for mail-in voting in GA, PA, and WI, and tell me why there was a drastic drop off of write-in ballots in this election. Numbers were all over the place. It's even worse when you look at it by county, so spare me the state and national averages (even though some of those are shady, also). 

This also doesn't explain the huge dumps of votes that occurred in Biden's favor and preposterous levels. And, no, the fact that they are mail-in ballots don't justify dumps of 99.5% in Biden's favor. Also, the human "error" that occurred late one night in MI, does not explain the other surges seen in GA, PA, and WI. Those kinds of swings are unheard of in elections. 

Bellwether counties were also off for the first time in FOREVER. And before you tell me the people aren't psychic... I already know this. They are bellwether counties because they share a similar demographic to that of the entire country, so that's why they have been consistent for the last 40 years. Yet, for some reason, 14 of 16 got it wrong this time? They've never been off by more than 2. 

What about the audio and video that corroborates witness testimony? It's not proof of anything, sure... but it definitely shows that the people making accusations aren't LYING. 

Don't talk about the courts, either, because the courts barely heard a case on the issue. Almost all of them rejected the case on standing. This just meant that Trump's team could only show there was fraud, but couldn't prove that it altered the course of the election. I agree with this ruling from a judicial standpoint, but that doesn't mean there wasn't serious fraud. There has been literally zero time dedicated to this in the MSM, when there SHOULD BE. 

Don't talk about the investigations, unless you can link to actual evidence that refutes the claims. Almost everything I've seen about the investigations just go something like this: "We had our guys look into it and we didn't find anything." Lack of evidence is not the same as the lack of a crime. It should be clear by now that our agencies only look as closely as they are told on any given matter. 

It's clear that election officials did not follow protocol in many of these democratic controlled counties. They kicked out observers that questioned any of the practices. They made adjustments on the fly, and there are instances of them specifically violating established procedures. Fine. They got away with one and Trump didn't get elected. HOWEVER... that doesn't mean there isn't widespread corruption. Democrats are the ones that have broken every tool we, as a society, have used to secure our elections. It's obvious they attack the structure that upholds our system of voting. Look at the "For the People Act" to see how they are doing it. Ask yourself, if promotions at my company were by vote only, would I want the system democrats are proposing? If you say yes, you are a moron. 

So there  you go. Start by REFUTING that. Don't just give me your opinion, or any of the other lame excuses I already provided on your behalf, because those explanations are inadequate. At the VERY least, we should be talking about this. It's what people do when they have issues with something. This wasn't even addressed by the MSM, and there is PLENTY here to address. It was worthy of news time, even if it was untrue, yet it was completely discarded.

 
Not going down that rabbit hole, sorry.  Nothing will ever convince you that you are wrong anyway.  This argument is a tar baby, and I don't find it entertaining, so I'm not going to do it.  

All I have to say is, they had their chance to prove these allegations in court, and they got nowhere.  A hundred judges said this is bull [BLEEP].