That's not what's happening in the courts. I've said it many times. The courts have largely done what they were supposed to do. Marty and his ilk continually misrepresent the role of the courts in this manner. They aren't hearing the cases because there is no hard evidence the election was stolen from Trump. Since there is nothing concrete, they can't take the case.

Think of it like this: you heard about a cop that wants to kill his girlfriend. He's talked about how much he hates her, and says he needs to get rid of her at any cost. He and other officers believe she has compromised the police department. She goes missing, they find her blood in his car, when they confronted the dude, he was in her room cleaning it. Witnesses say they saw him leave with her and return without her. He has a weak alibi, that's only corroborated by other police. The cops say they investigated, and when asked how, they say they asked if he did it and he said no. All signs point to foul play, but there's no body.

Her family takes it to the courts, but every single judge dismisses the case. They say they can't try someone for murder without a body. Which makes sense, right?

One day, you're talking to your two neighbors. One says they believe the courts are in on it because they don't want the police department to be exposed. Your other neighbor says the cop couldn't have killed her, and, as proof cites the "evidence" of the courts dismissing the case. Which of those two guys is dumber, Marty? Sure, the first neighbor is overzealous, but he's not wrong to be suspicious of something happening. The second neighbor CLEARLY doesn't understand the role of the courts if he is using that as PROOF she wasn't murdered. He's an idiot.

Again, I think the courts have ruled appropriately. There is no body as far a this election is concerned. They can't overturn an election without some kind of hard proof that SHOWS Trump would have won. Literally none of the evidence they have can prove Trump would have won. It only suggests that to be the case. So, people who think this should have been heard in the courts are misunderstanding their role in this process. However, people who are using this as PROOF that Trump didn't have the election stolen are equally, if not more, in the wrong. There is plenty of evidence that something shady occurred. We just are not looking into it with any kind of diligence. To make it worse, any attempt to find the body is being shut down.

Where judges have ruled for further investigations, they are being impeded by democrats and Brad freaking Raffensberger. Seriously, do you really believe this dude doesn't want an audit of Fulton county to protect its residents? Are you that naive? This dude should not be filing an amicus brief to prevent an audit from taking place in that county.

---