I kind of think that this may be ruled a mistrial.  Based on the petition from the defense for mistrial along with the judge himself saying that he hasn't had the chance to review yet, I kind of think that's where this is headed.

The biggest damning thing that the prosecution did was withhold evidence and then give the defense a degraded version of said evidence after the case was argued in court.

Nobody can say that the jury isn't swayed by the actions of several "democrats" outside of the courthouse demanding a certain outcome.  Ultimately I think that the judge is going to take "the hit" by ruling for a mistrial.

---