(11-20-2021, 10:52 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-20-2021, 10:42 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: When is Tulsi Gabbard going to switch parties?

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/...35840?s=20

I think she takes it a bit to far.  When a large section of the community feels a crime has been committed, there should be a trial.  The alternative is worse, when the people feel totally unheard.

No, no no.   Our judicial system should not be making decisions based "a large section" of the community's opinion.  Think it through.  

Here's an example.  A large section of the community thinks voter fraud has occurred.  Should there be a trial, regardless of whether there is any actual evidence?  Or should the judge follow the law and the (lack of) evidence and throw the case out of court?

---