(12-18-2021, 03:57 PM)Ronster Wrote:

(12-18-2021, 02:17 PM)Sneakers Wrote: It's a discouraging reality that the outcome of any criminal trial, especially one of such huge consequences, can so often be dependent on the relative skills of the prosecution and defense, rather than just the facts of the case.

Facts? Facts were some stupid inbred Marxist thought it would be smart to attack a kid with a rifle then other inbred Marxist joined in and found out that is not very smart. The only bad thing that happened was that one lived.  Rittenhouse did what he had to do to survive. That should put ALL would be Marxist pigs on notice, don’t start nuthin, there won’t be nuthin. But mess around and you’ll find out.

By the facts of this case, no sane prosecutor would attempt to file charges on this case.  No sane judge should have allowed this farce to continue.  

The Prosecutor should be disbarred and charged with federal violations of Kyle's Civil rights.  In open court, he suggested that the jury take a negative inference from Kyles constitutional right to remain silent (made even more egregious when the defendant planned to undergo cross examination).  He also suggested that your constitutional right to bear arms negates your right to self-defense.  This should get a first-year law student a one way ticket home, let alone a prosecutor.  

This is a disgusting example of Social/Collective justice.  The protestors had the right political beliefs, therefore anyone who opposed them or stopped them from destroying the city was engaged in hate, racism, sexism, ableism, colorism etc. and we now want to use the legal system to adjudicate that political difference with the force of law and incarceration.  This is a fundamental shredding of the constitution in ways most people don't really understand and i shudder to think what would have happened in the event there were no cameras!

---