(01-05-2022, 08:43 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:

(01-05-2022, 08:33 PM)Jags Wrote: How does that happen?  Khan is the man overseeing everything.  Shad oversees everything Jaguars.  It’s hard to separate one from another. The HC has been fired.  The GM is still on trial.   I agree it’s in bad taste to single out Khan, Bit at the same time it’s his decision to make things better.  Not to single you out or anything, but do we really believe TRent Baalke is our GM of the future?  Overwhelmingly, we agree his butt needs to be gone. Khan is the man that can make that happen but 2 weeks back said he’s getting retain.  So there is a fine line here. I don’t agree with mocking SK’s character or person. But his decisions are suspect.

You've pretty much repeated what I said. Let Khan know of our unhappiness with how the organization is run without mocking him.

I guess what I’m saying is this:  SK took responsibility and fired UM.  Great! But comes out a week or so later saying TB is safe.  We all, for the most part, are/were in awe with that decision.  We’ve been a clown show for some time. We all mostly agree TB needs to be next.  Truth be told, I fully expect him to be gone Monday following the game.  But since it is SK’s decision, how do they (the fans) convey their displeasure without it also going against Khan?  For starters, taking the mustache off the clown. I get that. But at the end of the day, it’s still all Khan and his decision making.  It’s not like we have Tom Coughlin running the show and we have multiple people to pin the tail on.

---