Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Article about our Rookie Class

#23
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2022, 01:52 PM by Caldrac.)

(01-11-2022, 01:30 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote:
(01-11-2022, 11:41 AM)Caldrac Wrote: Lageman thinks Little should be starting at LT and that Robinson should be tagged and moved to RT. He thinks he's a better fit over there.

This is why Lageman is on the radio and not in an NFL front office.

Cam is making $13.75 million and would get a 20% increase ($16.5 million) if we tag him 2x in a row.  So we'd essentially be demoting Cam to RT while paying him more than Taylor Lewan.  Here is a list of Offensive Linemen Contracts

https://overthecap.com/position/offensive-line/

Contract washes out if Little is your guy at LT and he's being paid on a 2nd RD rookie contract. It's a lot cheaper than drafting yet another LT 1st overall and hoping he's the next Boselli or Munoz. Which he's not being touted as at this point in time. 

It's also more affordable than trying to sign Armstead to a big contract deal to play LT and replace Robinson. Not to mention you're using cap space and a draft pick to address two positions that could have been utilized elsewhere in an area of clearer need.

(01-11-2022, 01:39 PM)ATLjag Wrote:
(01-11-2022, 11:41 AM)Caldrac Wrote: Lageman thinks Little should be starting at LT and that Robinson should be tagged and moved to RT. He thinks he's a better fit over there.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I like the idea of tagging (or signing) Robinson and moving him to RT.  However, I think the team would have a very disgruntled player that would not want to play RT, seeing himself as a very capable LT.  I wouldn't want an expensive 1 year rental at RT.   Is the answer to keep Robinson at LT and have Little learn RT?  

I do hate the idea of just letting Robinson just walk for no value back to the team.  At minimum, I would like to see Robinson tagged and traded to another team if it is realistic.

I think he would be content getting premium money to play at RT. In the NFL you need a pair of viable T's anyways as most defenses have kept pushing more and mover over the years to put their more disruptive pass rushers on the LE anyway. 

I think you make Robinson and Little duke it out for LT. Loser battles Taylor for RT. Taylor then decides to be an [BLEEP], not play Guard, hurt his value as a lineman and play swing T for his final year. Or, he can play G or win his job outright. 

It's a win-win without having to piss away yet another draft pick or shell out big bucks to a new guy. Use those resources elsewhere. A good scheme could also go a long way in masking some of that unit's issues anyway.
[Image: 4SXW6gC.png]

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by NCJag - 01-11-2022, 10:59 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Bullseye - 01-11-2022, 11:28 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Eric1 - 01-11-2022, 04:46 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Cleatwood - 01-11-2022, 11:43 AM
Article about our Rookie Class - by Caldrac - 01-11-2022, 11:41 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by DTWD4∞ - 01-11-2022, 11:47 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by NYC4jags - 01-11-2022, 12:43 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Mikey - 01-12-2022, 11:34 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by jaglou53 - 01-11-2022, 12:04 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by scottyg - 01-11-2022, 12:47 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Caldrac - 01-11-2022, 01:48 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by ATLjag - 01-11-2022, 01:39 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Caldrac - 01-11-2022, 11:51 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Sibelius - 01-11-2022, 01:34 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Upper - 01-11-2022, 12:15 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Caldrac - 01-11-2022, 12:43 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Mikey - 01-12-2022, 11:41 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by NYC4jags - 01-12-2022, 11:50 AM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Jag88 - 01-11-2022, 12:28 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by ATLjag - 01-11-2022, 01:28 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Upper - 01-11-2022, 02:31 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Newton - 01-11-2022, 04:10 PM
RE: Article about our Rookie Class - by Upper - 01-12-2022, 12:10 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!