(03-18-2022, 04:04 PM)Mikey Wrote:

(03-18-2022, 02:32 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: I'm talking about what Oakland traded for him.  

But let's take your hypothetical.   You would give up the #1 overall pick plus $28 million per year.  For a WR.  

That's insane.

don't forget the ginormous cap hit you'll be paying by the time he's 33, too.

---

(03-18-2022, 02:37 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: Yes, I would. It's not just for a WR. It's for the best WR in the NFL. After spending a #1 overall pick on the franchise QB we've been coveting for 25 years and having no viable WR's for him to throw to, it would be a wise investment. We certainly have no main target for him to throw to now and with the Packers trading away Adams, that's one more guaranteed premier WR off the board in round 1. I don't see a #1 WR falling to the #33 pick. That would mean another season of Lawrence throwing to a subpar WR group.

because there's no way we can trade up, right? If you think any of these guys can be that dang good, why hoard picks, get on the phone, make some deals and get the guy you covet.

Perfectly happy with us shopping next year's first and other picks to jump back into day 1.