(04-14-2022, 10:17 AM)Kane Wrote:

(04-13-2022, 11:53 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: For the worst QB in his division. Wow.

I believe only 20 something is fully gtd though. That's the market. He's better than half ish of the league, probably better option than trying a rookie from this class. If you got a guy eventually you have to pay him, if you got a guy that's somewhere in the middle you'll likely overpay unless you wanna start all over with a new rookie.

I see him as being in the Tannehill level of QBs. Good enough that your team can win games with him and possibly even get confused into thinking he's an upper tier guy, but in big games he comes up small.

Kind of like David Garrard, he's a guy for which a coach would feel like they can game plan for the level of consistency they get, but they're going to be terrified if they have to put it in the QB's hands to go win a big game.

---