(04-22-2022, 03:23 AM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:

(04-22-2022, 02:11 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: Can this go in deebo thread lol

My ocd kicks in when there r multiple threads for a topic that cpuld just be combined into 1 big thread

If somebody wants to start a dicussion on a specific idea/topic I think it should be allowed it's own thread. Posting a new question just because it's relating to a specific player mentioned elsewhere may get no replies/discussion and on top of that, this forum is extremely small and isn't hurting from new threads/topics. 

My personal opinion on that matter. And I agree, if we could get Deebo we should.

---

(04-22-2022, 03:01 AM)TheDogCatcher Wrote: Deebo would function well in Pederson's offense; however, he's not the prototypical X receiver everyone says we need. Because of that, I wouldn't waste draft capital. He's not JaMarr Chase, Stephon Diggs, etc. While Deebo strikes fear in defenders because he's like a faster Greg Jones, he doesn't take the top off defenses and open up everything underneath. 

A potential Deebo is already on the roster for much much cheaper -- Viska. Let's hope his Year 2 can be forgotten so he can build on his strong rookie year under better coaches' tutelage. 

I wish we could trade back and nab Thibs and London. That would be my dream draft addressing the top two needs with blue-chip prototypes.

Please for the love of god don't compare Lavisko to Deebo. If you've watched Deebo a bit more you'd notice that, while he does play a similar role to how we have used Shenault the man has real ability as a WR, He runs really good routes, has great hands and much better speed. Shenault  drops balls. Their comparision ends at playcalling.