(06-10-2022, 12:22 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(06-10-2022, 10:37 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: His point is that the scope of the BLM riots was far greater and more damaging than the Federal Agent-initiated violence at the Capital yet most of the BLM "activists" were let off scot-free and Congress couldn't be bothered to stage a Witch Hunt hearing to address those actual riots but can find time to persecute the overwhelmingly peaceful demonstrators from the D.C. event. And he's right to point out the disparity in treatment between the left's prized criminals and the American Patriots of January 6th. But you know that already Capt. Contrarian.

A breach by a mob determined to attack the Vice President and the Speaker of the House was, in your mind, less serious than earlier riots in other cities? Were any judges or other local officials harmed or threatened with harm by any of those riots?
You say the US congress should hold hearings on these other protests, but not on the one where Congress itself was attacked?
And I'm the contrarian?

(06-10-2022, 05:38 PM)p_rushing Wrote:

(06-10-2022, 12:22 PM)mikesez Wrote: A breach by a mob determined to attack the Vice President and the Speaker of the House was, in your mind, less serious than earlier riots in other cities? Were any judges or other local officials harmed or threatened with harm by any of those riots?
You say the US congress should hold hearings on these other protests, but not on the one where Congress itself was attacked?
And I'm the contrarian?

The mob that "breached" was let in and did not breach anything. The "mob" was also full of feds and antifa to setup the rest of the people that were peaceful.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk