(06-12-2022, 08:11 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(06-12-2022, 05:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: 1. The Mike Williams deal happened before the Kirk deal 

2. The Kirk deal is structured WAYY differently then all of those it supposedly inflated (lower % of guaranteed $$ and a two year team out clause most notably. 

3. Single Outliers don't shift market behavior meaningfully. Trends do. 

 4. Individual teams who want their guy will pay what they can to get him - but if they are letting an agent bully the price up on a Tyreek Hill "because of" Christian Kirk - they are simply bad negotiators and their behavior is contributing to a market shift as much as - or more than the Kirk deal.

1.  Williams and Kirk are 2 totally different players lol.   Williams is a deal I would call a team friendly deal.  1 is a guy that could be a number 1 on a lot of teams and the other is a good slot WR.  Can Kirk improve on the outside? Hopefully, but his deal is based on what they are hoping he can do not on what he has done.

You're the same guy that spent two pages defending the Kirk deal based on his production and our lack of production at his position, plus quoting slot receiver stats to justify it RIGHT??

I'll post your words here if that's what you really want. 
I doubt you do, since you're now talking out of both sides of your mouth. 

The whole slot vs outside thing is kind of a joke at this point - and anyone who has broken down successful offenses in the past ten years has seen multiple teams win with slot production over X and Z. Of course the ideal is having a #1 guy at X, but in the same way 32 teams don't have a franchise QB, many have to find a way without an elite X until it comes around for them.

---