(05-29-2022, 07:40 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(05-25-2022, 04:16 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:
Cardinals took Josh Rosen in the top 10. He sucked. 
Drafted Kyler Murray the following year. He good.

That's why.

(05-29-2022, 07:31 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: Well I mean that would have been a 100% success rate if Elway wasn't an etitled prick who refused to play for them.

---

I wasn't the one on this thread that posted Josh Rosens stat comparision, all I said was if he has another piss poor year like the last we shouldn't hold on for 5 years and let real qbs go over our heads like we did with Watson/mahomes/josh allen etc while we stuck with the boat.

Screw his stat comparison - you clearly claimed Rosen's failure was the reason the Jaguars would draft a QB #1 twice in three years. It's all right there at the top quote in this post. 

Always running from your horrible takes with deflection and backpedaling.

I'm sorry that it's so difficult for you to use your noggin. Rosen was my comparision to the idea of not holding on to a QB longer than you should. The entire point was bringing up how they realized early on he wasn't the guy, and immediately moved on and it worked well for them. Someone else compared Lawrence to Rosen statistically. I was talking about the thread topic of potentially moving on this year if we have the #1 pick again and Lawrence isn't good. 

How are you not able to understand that?

---

(05-29-2022, 08:34 PM)Bullseye Wrote:

(05-29-2022, 07:31 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: Well I mean that would have been a 100% success rate if Elway wasn't an etitled prick who refused to play for them.

---

Coulda woulda shoulda.

Bottom line is it didn't work out, and there are reasons why only two teams in forty years have done what you suggest...namely, it's a stupid waste of resources, and QBs often take time to develop, even under ideal circumstances.

In the Schlichter instance, their subsequent choice of Elway only happened because Elway was clearly the superior prospect.  None of the guys at the top of next year's draft rate as highly a prospect as Lawrence.

What do you mean coulda shoulda woulda?
 
Elway wasn't a better QB than the guy they tried to replace him with? Kyler isn't better than Rosen? 

To your other point, how can you claim that one of the guys in this coming draft wont be considered an upgrade come years end? If we are selecting #1 overall again, without the urban meyer excuse and Trevor Lawrence has a back to back horrendus outting, how can you pretend he's good at that point? Again i'm not saying any of that will happen, I think it's really doubtful that he's going to be THAT BAD the point was IF HE WAS not that HE WILL BE. 


Some of you should read the title of the thread before responding to posts..

---