(07-04-2022, 07:32 PM)copycat Wrote:

(07-04-2022, 02:35 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: In the case of Roe the court took on a question not before them, that's activism.

Privacy is an implicit right in the constitution, without it multiple other rights can't exist, so to suddenly decide to find that women don't have a right to privacy in their medical decisions is activism.

The EPA case was a specious and nonsensical finding, essentially deciding that there are arbitrary limits to the government's ability to do its legislatively decided job.

Roe v Wade, even Ruth Bader Ginsburgh agreed the ruling was incorrect. What the the current court did was put it back to each state to decide OR make congress do it’s job and pass a law that makes abortion the law of the land.  Your ire should be directed at the cowards in your party that refuse to bring this up when they have all3 branches of power.

The EPA ruling is much the same.  Unelected officials cannot make laws.  It is the responsibility of the House and Congress to make laws.