(07-18-2022, 06:41 AM)JagsorDie Wrote:

(07-18-2022, 06:15 AM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: I did like Luck coming out a lot more than Trevor. He looked like an NFL QB playing against children. It was blatantly obvious he'd be good in the NFL. To me, Trevor in college had flashes of greatness, but at times looked lost. I never really saw that inconsistency with Andrew Luck.

I had that feeling as well. Where we differ, is that I attributed that gap in class as him playing in the PAC more than I did him being purely NFL ready(in hindsight I realize he was). The same argument can be made about TL because he played in the ACC but I think with Clemson always being in either the playoff or all the way to the National Championship game against a top team gave me more of a feel for him against top comp. 

I’m not going to argue that he didn’t have inconsistencies last season but those are not things that stood out to me while he was at Clemson. I think that is why I have a easier time writing some(not all) of those faults off as falling more on his supporting cast and the situation he as in last year than on his game.

When I saw him play in college, it always seemed like if he had a decent crew around him he would flourish and his team was one of the best in the country.

(07-18-2022, 06:54 AM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(07-18-2022, 06:15 AM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: I did like Luck coming out a lot more than Trevor. He looked like an NFL QB playing against children. It was blatantly obvious he'd be good in the NFL. To me, Trevor in college had flashes of greatness, but at times looked lost. I never really saw that inconsistency with Andrew Luck.

You must watch a lot of college football. How many hours a week would you estimate you spend pouring over game film?

I don't typically watch college football casually. There is a website where you can watch all of a players snaps from whatever game you want, in a short video. Realisticly you could go back and watch every pass Lawrence made in college in less than an hour there. Ironically enough I think the first time I found this website was the year Andrew Luck came out. But that's where I form my opinions on college prospects.

---

(07-18-2022, 06:41 AM)JagsorDie Wrote:

(07-18-2022, 06:15 AM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: I did like Luck coming out a lot more than Trevor. He looked like an NFL QB playing against children. It was blatantly obvious he'd be good in the NFL. To me, Trevor in college had flashes of greatness, but at times looked lost. I never really saw that inconsistency with Andrew Luck.

I had that feeling as well. Where we differ, is that I attributed that gap in class as him playing in the PAC more than I did him being purely NFL ready(in hindsight I realize he was). The same argument can be made about TL because he played in the ACC but I think with Clemson always being in either the playoff or all the way to the National Championship game against a top team gave me more of a feel for him against top comp. 

I’m not going to argue that he didn’t have inconsistencies last season but those are not things that stood out to me while he was at Clemson. I think that is why I have a easier time writing some(not all) of those faults off as falling more on his supporting cast and the situation he as in last year than on his game.

When I saw him play in college, it always seemed like if he had a decent crew around him he would flourish and his team was one of the best in the country.

That Clemson team was just as good before he got there with Watson. Infact Watson and Lawrence had very similar numbers/success/production. Makes you wonder why Watson wasn't considered a generational talent, I mean he came in his rookie year on a bad Texans team and looked pretty damn good from the start. 19 Tds 8 ints in only 6 starts his rookie year. 7 more touchdown passes in 11 less starts than Lawrence. That's wild.

---