(08-06-2022, 10:13 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(08-05-2022, 09:57 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: Don't get whiny. The warning will expire before too long.

That was sarcasm, bro. I don't care what you do. Simpleton is to don't be simple as whiner is to don't get whiny. If all you need me to do is add three words, I'll keep that in mind for future reference. I think we're really going places with these high standards.

---

(08-06-2022, 08:30 AM)mikesez Wrote: Claiming that an election was stolen when it wasn't is violence against the US constitution.
Speech that says we should stop having a constitution, that the president, congress and courts are no longer legitimate, is permissible per the 1st amendment,  of course.  But it is still against the constitution.

More words are violence nonsense. Are people who want to ban ARs being violent against the constitution, too?

Words aren't really violence when spoken against people.  But the constitution is not people.  The constitution is words.  Words can be violent towards other words.  It's kinda how religion and law work.  
If someone claims that the government can take all guns from everyone without first amending the constitution, yes, those words are violence against the constitution.  Those would be words saying that the Constitution doesn't matter and can be disregarded.

---