(12-06-2022, 12:59 AM)p_rushing Wrote:

(12-04-2022, 01:29 PM)mikesez Wrote: That is not what the 1st amendment means and not how it works.
As Musk himself said, it's freedom of speech, not freedom of reach.  
Twitter is allowed to mute whatever tweet they want to mute.  And they are allowed to work with or against any government or political party they want to as they go.  If they want to work with CDC, fine.  If they want to work against CDC, fine.  That's the first amendment.   There has never been any ban on private speakers working with the government.

What don't you understand about the government can't infringe on your rights in the bill of rights?

Twitter can do whatever they want as long as they aren't breaking laws. You as a private citizen can reach out and ask them to do something about information about you or anything else that may not be true or that you just don't like.

As soon as a GOVERNMENT representative does it, they are now infringing on your rights of free speech.

There are no ifs ands or buts about it. If you then certify your own crimes, you just committed treason. There is no one in Arizona unfortunately that will hold them accountable though to the treason that just took place as they have emails in the Missouri vs Biden case showing she asked to remove accounts and tweets.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

You don't lose your right to have and express opinions when you join the government.  You just can't back your requests up with any threat of force (by the way private citizens are also not allowed to use threats of force to get their way in matters of opinion).  If these government representatives threatened to use government power to harm Twitter over matters of opinion, yes, that would be a violation of the 1st amendment.  If they simply requested it, it is not.

---