(12-28-2022, 10:56 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(12-27-2022, 11:25 PM)p_rushing Wrote: The dem lawyer actually said it was the voter's fault that the printer malfunctions disenfranchised them because they didn't use early voting.

What would the dems from the 90s say about black people waiting until the last minute after getting off work to vote and the polling centers closing?

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Printer malfunctions didn't disenfranchise anyone.  Every vote was counted.  

What happened was, Democrats voted early, so they weren't subject to long lines as machines malfunctioned.  So anything that happened on election day disproportionately affected Republicans.  

There are several ways to deal with this.  One of the most effective ways is for Republicans to vote early like Democrats have been doing.  Then anything that happens on election day affects everyone equally.  With so many machines and so many voting places, things are bound to go wrong somewhere.  So avoid that by voting early.

Prove that it didn't disenfranchise anyone, all votes were counted, and all duplicated ballots still match the way the person actually voted.


That was what the whole case was about. You can't prove anything because none of the laws were followed. There is no chain of custody, they don't even know how many votes they should have, how many were sent to be counted, how many were counted, etc. The duplicated ballots were separated from their original ballots, so there is no way to confirm the counts, the votes, etc.

No one can prove fraud as there is nothing to test against. The law wasn't followed and the election should have been voided. There could be no fraud, even though there are sworn testimony about fraud occurring. Neither side can prove anything as there are so many purposeful failures in their procedures that break the law to confirm anything with this election.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---