(03-31-2023, 10:45 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(03-31-2023, 10:42 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: He’s not preventing New York from retrieving Trump, if they so choose.

Oh, okay.  I don't think it will come up anyway, I think Trump will go to New York.  Heck, how would he campaign if he has to be holed up in Florida the whole time?  

It's kind of a thin case, anyway.  I think he has a good chance of beating it.

(03-31-2023, 10:40 AM)MarleyJag Wrote:

(03-31-2023, 10:05 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: For anyone with a shred of impartiality, it’s obvious this is a witch hunt. I’m not defending Trump, if the guy broke the law then prosecute him as anyone else would be. But from everything that has been divulged to the public so far, it’s a legalistic reach, and we all know why.

As I said, this is setting a bad precedent that will have effects and ramifications beyond this election.

It does seem like for this to make any sense they need to have something else which is why I'd like to see the actual charges and evidence. If all they have is what they seem to have, I agree it's not worthwhile. Charging a president or ex-president with a crime is not a bad-precedent if they deserve it. Not charging them in the past has been the bad precedent.