(03-31-2023, 12:21 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(03-31-2023, 12:20 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: I love how you and the NYT write out things like "fact" when it's not. It does the real job they are trying to of merely associating Trump with a crime rather than actually proving he did anything wrong. It's nothing but plain old mudslinging.

Payments were made related to Stormy Daniels in 2016.  The public did not know until 2018.   It was hidden, and he lied.  Those are facts.

No [BLEEP]. It doesn't prove intent, though. Not even close. It's almost impossible to prove intent in a court of law. That's why this case is a sham. Not only that, the intent could just as easily be reversed. Please, tell me, that if Trump HAD paid his lawyer with campaign funds, that you don't believe this DA would think that was on the up and up. Lol, no... they would just say that he can't use campaign funds to fund a private matter. What's that? This DA is noble and true? Dream on, brother.

---