(04-04-2023, 01:01 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(04-04-2023, 12:03 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: I just don't think you fully gurantee a contract for a player who could very well be beat out and cut before the season starts. And under normal circumstances I probably wouldn't care much because of how little his salary is, but when you have next to no cap space I don't see the point. 

Could have very well been the difference in us resigning Calais had we still had that extra 2m, and personally I think even at his age he would have been super beneficial to both Walker and Josh Allen even had he only been here for a season.

---

You are desperately scrambling to find a way to make Herndon's minuscule deal a bad thing. 
It's not - and you look silly trying. 

They offered Calais what they wanted to pay him. 
If they wanted him bad enough to offer more, they would have cleared more cap.
They weren't in some back and forth bidding war. They made their offer and then the player chose a higher offer elsewhere. 

Didn't have a damn thing to do with Tre Herndon making peanuts to back up the NB position.

---

(04-04-2023, 12:58 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Related to Herndon though, unless OTC and Spotrac are both wrong, how does he have $2.5m guaranteed, only $150k as a signing bonus, but only a $1.3m cap hit?

Over the cap says 2.4 mil guaranteed and a 1.3mil savings by cutting him prior to June 1.