(04-08-2023, 10:18 AM)NH3 Wrote:

(04-07-2023, 10:52 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Obsession? More like target practice.

As for the rest of your point, sure.... one can have a wise or thoughtful insight without having gone through a particular experience, I happily agree to that. I've never argued otherwise. Keep in mind you created that tangent by trying to be Socratic (and failing), instead of just STATING IT like a normal human being. You didn't WOW anyone with that revelation. Furthermore, I don't know that anyone here was even saying that, since Americus specifically said she thought you were speaking BS about the topic... ie, you're wrong. She never said you couldn't have an opinion or insight.

Your position that we should put kids on puberty blockers until they can decide their gender is harmful, moronic, and unnecessary. However,  you're still too intellectually lazy to update yourself on the puberty blocker research. It's faux intellectualism at its finest. Your opinion the main subject is poorly thought out and rooted in self-indulgence. There. Now we're back on topic.

Holly [BLEEP]. I knew that train was about to derail.

NH3...

Yeah, well, good thing that's not actually my position. 
I would never say that every single kid should get a new medical treatment.  
It's a very specific, very small number of kids, who should be allowed to get this treatment if they want it, if their parents agree, and under the supervision of both a psychiatrist and an endocrinologist. Probably not that different from your position or L2L's position.

---