(05-05-2023, 02:37 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote:

(05-05-2023, 01:10 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: You can value the RB position but also not want to pay them big money or use a top 100 pick on them.

I'm not sure how you can value the RB position relative to other positions if you're unwilling to allocate more meaningful resources toward it.  That sounds more like the definition of de-valuing the position, which is fine. It is by all accounts much more likely that a given RB's career is going to be more short lived than that of other positions.  Your qualifiers make it sound more like just paying lip service to the idea of valuing the position though.

I like having good RBs. Good RBs are great!

However, you can find them allllll over. Pacheco was in the 7th round last year and the Chiefs 1st rounder road the pine. In fact, Pacheco and FA off the street McKinnon vastly out played the first round pick of CEH.

Great to have good RBs but build a good system and you can find them just about anywhere.

---