(06-12-2023, 06:59 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(06-11-2023, 01:45 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: No, because what anyone else believes in immaterial to his authority. He can do what he did, end of story. Now, if the legislature and the judiciary wish to more clearly define that authority I would endorse that approach, but to say, at this time, that he did something he did not have the authority to do, well...that's retrospective action and clearly only being done for political purposes. Meanwhile, the current resident of the Oval Office had documents that the VP was not authorized to posses strewn about his personal properties and no one gives a [BLEEP]. Because this isn't about documents, it's about candidacy.

Did you read the indictment?

(06-11-2023, 03:57 PM)WingerDinger Wrote:

(06-11-2023, 02:40 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: You have no say in what I would or wouldn't do. Unlike you some folks don't twist with the prevailing winds and actually have principles. Meanwhile, you hate Trump so much that you're stuck defending a walking vegetable who plays for the team that hates your guts.

You're getting caught up in that ole Okie Doak.. It's not worth the time or effort to have a serious conversation. Once a contrarian, always a contrarian. Tell him that the air is clean to breathe, he'll never take off his mask.