(07-20-2023, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(07-20-2023, 08:41 PM)p_rushing Wrote: And if the SoS is in on the crime? The rules were followed, no one stopped the SoS, and in Michigan it was the opposite and they refused to allow them in the building.

It's a made up crime and they tried to get the DOJ to do something but they were told there was no crime.


There are procedures for contested elections and even though the state has certified a group of electors, it doesn't mean that 2 groups can't show up. The federal government then has to decide to send them back, review the evidence, and decide which ones to recognize. None of that happens if the other group isn't elected and sent. They were following the procedures and it was the democrats that tried to stop everything.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

No dude.
Just no.
The electoral count act that was in effect in 2020 had been written after the 1876 election when three states were disputed, and all three were in flux in terms of what state constitution they were even under due to reconstruction ending.
Ignoring that.
Yes, federal law allows for the possibility of two sets of Electors sending in ballots. It's not a federal crime if two sets of ballots are sent.  But it is a state crime.  The state must maintain its legitimacy and punish those who illegitimately claim to speak for them.

No crime though. They are claiming the state cheated and the SoS is a part of the cheating. Laws were clearly broken by the states but courts didn't care. You can go read why they were sent. They weren't sent to revolt, they didn't represent themselves as the certified electors by the SoS, and they didn't go and kill the other electors and replace them.

They were sent because of the broken laws, cheating, and whatever other bribery or crimes were needed to keep the courts from stopping it. If the state didn't stop it, the representatives of the other states had a chance to stop it as their interests are at risk if 1 state is cheating.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---