(08-15-2023, 06:15 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:

(08-15-2023, 02:29 AM)p_rushing Wrote: So it was a fake published on their website? Right, sure we will go with that.

It was either incompetence or done on purpose.

If you have ever been in a government building in Fulton County, you can understand that incompetence would be the initial thought. The few times I had to go to this building or one of the others, I tried to interact as little as possible with the employees or I wouldn't get whatever I needed done. I almost lost it once and asked the head of the tax department if him or any of his employees knew how to add and subtract. (Don't buy a car out of state and register it in GA or at least don't prepay any taxes as they don't do math).

The indictment shouldn't have been sent to be published before the grand jury had deliberated and released their verdict. Legally this shows bias, prejudice, and malicious prosecution. The grand jury was sealed and this was unsealed without a verdict being reached. Courts throw out cases for paperwork errors and this is a huge issue for someone who is presumed innocent. The indictment should easily be nullified and sanctions placed on the DA. Courts take that very serious and if Trump wants to push it he could.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Good question. Here’s a couple of news article, rather than a tweet from some random person who echoes an ideological view, which addresses that question. The answer? There is none. It was deflected by the DA. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...r-AA1fhGKT

https://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/ful...nst-trump/

We all know they weren't hacked and someone sent the file to be entered to the clerk. The clerks generally just do what the paperwork says, they don't usually have to think in their job. They have to deal with jury duty and other stuff, so they follow procedures and don't deviate. Someone leaked and sent it. For a sealed grand jury, there is very limited access. The DA or one of the other attorneys on the team would have had to leak it.

Which the DA should face the consequences for the leak of a sealed case.

(08-15-2023, 12:26 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(08-15-2023, 12:17 PM)Sneakers Wrote: You forgot one rather important word (assuming you believe in all that fair and impartial trial nonsense).

The primary function of the Secret Service is to protect him, which could not be done effectively if he was incarcerated.

A mountain of evidence is already public knowledge. 
I didn't forget to add that word. 
It's just a matter of prosecutors doing their jobs at this point.

Mountain of evidence of no wrongdoing. Read through this mess of charges and tell us where the actual crime was because you can't have RICO charges without an actual crime.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---