(08-15-2023, 01:10 PM)p_rushing Wrote:

(08-15-2023, 06:15 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Good question. Here’s a couple of news article, rather than a tweet from some random person who echoes an ideological view, which addresses that question. The answer? There is none. It was deflected by the DA. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...r-AA1fhGKT

https://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/ful...nst-trump/

We all know they weren't hacked and someone sent the file to be entered to the clerk. The clerks generally just do what the paperwork says, they don't usually have to think in their job. They have to deal with jury duty and other stuff, so they follow procedures and don't deviate. Someone leaked and sent it. For a sealed grand jury, there is very limited access. The DA or one of the other attorneys on the team would have had to leak it.

Which the DA should face the consequences for the leak of a sealed case.

(08-15-2023, 12:26 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: A mountain of evidence is already public knowledge. 
I didn't forget to add that word. 
It's just a matter of prosecutors doing their jobs at this point.

Mountain of evidence of no wrongdoing. Read through this mess of charges and tell us where the actual crime was because you can't have RICO charges without an actual crime.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk