(08-15-2023, 08:22 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(08-15-2023, 08:10 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Haha the clerk claimed she needed to send a test indictment because this one was large and could have issues.

1st - if the indictment was known to be large but was under seal, so how did she know it was large?
2nd - why did all the charges match the ones in the indictment? Why did it have Trump's info on it and not a dummy?
3rd - why did it get a case id and get docketed?

The court systems don't work like this. You don't test sending an indictment through because it triggers a lot of automations that happen for the case. You can generally test print a case but that usually requires someone in the courtroom to receive and verify it or a special test printer setup.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Why does it matter?
It created some extra, confusing paperwork for some of the courthouse workers. They are done.
It had no impact on the prosecutor, the defense, or the judge beyond that.

IT WAS A SEALED GRAND JURY. They had not even deliberated when it was posted. It was illegal to do that, it was illegally shared with her, and she had access to SPI that she shouldn't have had access to. Grand juries are just rubber stamps now but if they didn't and said no indictment, then publishing a secret grand jury hurts Trump.

I know you want to selectively follow the law but the DA should be taking the fall for all if these issues from a poorly run office and the one responsible for securing the sealed information.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

---