(08-27-2023, 09:46 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(08-27-2023, 09:14 AM)Sneakers Wrote: If the Court finds no credible evidence to support the charges, will you accept the verdict, or will you continue to insist Trump acted in a deliberate attempt to circumvent the Constitution?

As I said in another thread, the people who wrote our various criminal laws didn't exactly foresee Trump.  You could weasel out and say his conduct isn't [b]violating technical aspects of our specific constitution.[/b] exactly what the statute says.  That may be how it goes.  I guess I would accept that, but, I still know what we all saw and what he did.  Impeachment was the appropriate remedy.

---

(08-27-2023, 09:25 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Preach! And throw in their righteous indignation and general smugness about their ignorance. Ole Mikey doesn't even realize how stupid it is for him to say, "yeah, they are corrupt, but they follow the Constitution." Lol, like that's how it works. 

Seriously, that's so ridiculous on its face. Mikey, what's wrong with you, man? There wouldn't even be a Trump if these dudes just followed the law like the rest of us. Your standards are [BLEEP], mate. Not mine.

A constitution is, broadly speaking and at a minimum, the system of norms that says "who is in charge now?", "how much longer will they be in charge?" and "who will be in charge after that?".
The Democrats conduct isn't exactly what the statute says are violating technical aspects of our specific constitution.
Trump tried to violate fundamental aspects of our constitution,  aspects common to every other constitution in the world.