(08-29-2023, 03:31 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(08-29-2023, 03:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: dear lort...


You keep trying to act like what he was informed of was something he could "take under advisement" as he deemed fit. 
That's not the case. 

This is clearly why I keep correcting your piss poor word choice, but please, make yourself appear the fool by insulting my understanding of the English language. LOL 


he was INFORMED of the actual result of the election -  and he lost it. You can't semantics your way out of that. 
Pure and simple. 
Black and white. 
Open and shut. 
He lost. 


 There isn't this room for leeway you keep trying to inject with YOUR semantics. 
[BLEEP] lost.
He was informed he lost by officials of multiple government agencies. 
He was informed he was lying about the results by multiple government agencies. 
Doesn't matter if he thinks they are "credible" LOL - they are credible whether he likes it or not.  

YET - he criminally tried to change the outcome. He [BLEEP] around and he is officially finding out.
Simple. 

Lol. No. Only in your head is that simple. If you're the president of the US, you are not required to believe your cabinet members. That's an asinine starting position for this debate.

---

Quote:advise
verb
ad·vise əd-ˈvīz
advised; advising
Synonyms of advise
transitive verb

1
a
: to give (someone) a recommendation about what should be done : to give advice to
Her doctor advised her to try a drier climate.
b
: CAUTION, WARN
advise them of the consequences
c
: RECOMMEND
advise prudence
2
: to give information or notice to : INFORM
advise them of their rights

Bolded the important part. Wouldn't hurt you to learn something in this thread.

Jeebus, you have a thick skull.

The prez does not have to believe his cabinet but that isn't what I said. READ IT AGAIN
Holy hell. 

If you want to know which government agencies INFORMED the loser of the election that he lost and which agencies INFORMED him that he was lying about the results, go read the indictment.
 It's all clearly cited there. 
I've already posted that info here multiple times and I'm not going to continue spoon feeding you basic information like that over and over again while you act like a 7th grade grammar student quoting definitions.

He doesn't get to decide if this INFORMATION - not advice - is credible form these agencies. 
 
It wasn't his cabinet
It wasn't "advice"

He was given credible information - ignored it - lied about it - then acted criminally to change the election result.

---