(08-30-2023, 12:16 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(08-30-2023, 12:00 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Lol, yep, you answered the question for yourself right in your own Copy Pasta. All you need to know about that survey is "Global Strategy Group" to know that it's biased and not worth the bits used to put it on the internet.

Meanwhile, the Soros dots are connected by millions of traceable dollars and 20% of the DAs in this country being directly beholden to him. And we see the results in the crime rates in our cities.

https://www.policedefense.org/wp-content...report.pdf

A. You waive off a poll because of a source even thought the demo information staring you in the face says it was spread amongst a matched sample of the voter population 
OK - your choice - I bet it's a pretty accurate assessment of American's temperature on the matter

B. You seem to think that campaign contributions mean that the contributor controls the elected official. 
Taking money for a campaign does not make an official "directly beholden" to anyone. LOL - If you tried to apply that "logic" to everyone holding office, you'd very rapidly see how horribly stupid it is to make that ridiculous assumption.