(08-30-2023, 04:45 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(08-30-2023, 08:43 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: "Selective enforcement of the law"

HAHAHAHAHAHA

That's cute. 

Law broken
Crime charged.

It is just hilarious how every time something is simple and black and white, you feel the need to twist it into a pretzel and assign it a special little fictional term or word. 
Good luck with that. 

I must have asked you a hundred times not to put words in my mouth or thoughts in my head. 
Don't ever presume to tell me what I "know" - especially when it's followed by some horse [BLEEP] you've decided to believe because of your own paranoia. 

These dates need to be expedient so that the American people are not subject to another of this clown's criminal power grab attempts. Couldn't be easier to sort out.  If he is indeed guilty, then expedience is paramount to protect our nation from him. Precedent exists nearly everywhere you look in the legal world for an expedient trial.

I'm wondering where all of the hate toward DAs in America was before these indictments? I sure don't remember this being a problem until orange [BLEEP] got indicted. LOL It's just more grasping at straws to protect a blatant criminal from his blatant crimes.
  Let's not act like it has to be some agenda just because some folks involved in these cases don't like Trump.
60-70% of America doesn't like Trump depending on which poll you believe. 
The odds are in favor of these DAs being anti Trump, pal.
 I know that rubs against your default setting of everything under the sun being wrapped in a shroud of mystery and guided by boogeymen controlled by a secret code word only accessed by capturing an Alex Jones fart in a mason-jar and delivering it to one of Rupert Murdoch's Vietnamese sex-slaves with a blood offering, but that is indeed the simple reality. MOST people, including many prosecutors, and, gasp!, even some judges, do not like the guy. 

WITCH HUNT!  LOL 

Criminal does crime. 
Criminal gets prosecuted.

Next...

This should tell  you everything you need to know about your bias. It's an indictment. It hasn't been tried. You don't have proof of [BLEEP], yet you smugly talk like your opinion is beyond reproach. He hasn't been tried yet. There is another half to this case. The indictment doesn't PROVE ANYTHING. It's a charge. It's manipulated. Just like that video I posted, Dems acknowledged a few years back that a good DA can bring an indictment about pretty much anything they want. You keep doing you, bro. This country is really taking a turn for the better under democratic leadership.

I'm sorry you haven't been following the former president's case. 

Boatloads of evidence have been made public that indicate it should be quite easy for prosecutors to make most of these charges stick. I mean they were mostly already public anyway, but ...whatever. 

It kind of helps when the defendant continually opens his mouth and incriminates himself. 

I'm not sure why you want to call my ability to see my own nose in front of my face "bias." 
LOL 

Sometimes it's just really, really simple. 
The dude tried to get his own VP to recognize a blatant scam of false electoral votes and there is a paper trail, text messages, and documentation out the wazoo. It's all laid out and there are former lawyers and advisors flipping on the guy to try and limit their complicity. Why do you act like this stuff isn't "out there" for everyone with eyes to see?  

It would be a miracle if he escapes from these obvious crimes unscathed by the various courts of law he'll face.

---