(08-31-2023, 08:59 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(08-31-2023, 08:47 AM)Sneakers Wrote: We're in uncharted territory in so many ways.  The trial of someone under SS protection, especially at the ex-President level, is unprecedented.  As this develops, I'm expecting a flurry of motions over venue, appearance, etc.


This is the critical point I've been emphasizing, much of the "proof" you believe exists is not yet of record.  These individuals represent potential evidence that could flip the decision either way.  Public statements and emails cannot be retracted, but I don't believe he will be convicted on the strength of those alone.  Testimony of private conversations is what may or may not establish criminal intent.

So you haven't read the Eastman emails