(09-06-2023, 09:21 AM)Sneakers Wrote:

(09-06-2023, 06:57 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: They don't want to know, so they gravitate to news sources that don't cover it.

Where can one find this mountain of incontrovertible evidence that you claim exists and is already in public circulation?

You could have just followed the Jan6 hearings and the litany of reports that came out during the indictment announcements. Links to articles flooded my feed on twitter, and the vast majority quoted reliable sources like Reuters and direct quotes from testimony. You aren't going to see it if your "news" exposure is tuned mostly to the Fox/Newsmax infotainment sources of the world. 

I've also posted a solid amount of it in multiple threads here only for it to be "answered" with conspiracy theory and other unfounded garbage echoing right-bent pundits scrabbling for excuses and lies to explain Trump's lost election and justify his crimes. 

It is not hard to find. 

Here is a summary of evidence known in the documents case:
https://www.justsecurity.org/83034/track...documents/


The evidence in the NY business fraud case concerning his taxes and hush payment routing is literally undisputed by his lawyers. It includes a mountain of documentation that verifies Letitia James' claims/charges as well as direct deposition from Trump himself which is available in transcript. The numbers do not lie. 

The false electors scheme has tons of supporting evidence obtained during the Jan 6 hearings:

Ronna McDaniel (RNC Chair) testified damning evidence implicating Trump in the scheme. Including details of a phone call he was on outlaying the illegal plan. 
Election officials and Republican lawmakers from 3 different states involved in that ^ scheme also testified damning evidence.
Ru

Quote:Rusty Bowers, the former Republican speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, testified that when he was pressured to create a false slate of electors, he told Trump: "You're asking me to do something against my oath. I will not break my oath."
ABC news ^

Emails between Trump aides and Trump's lawyers outline that Trump knew Pence could not legally accept the false electors but that he intended to pressure Pence to do it anyway. There is also testimony from three people about Trump's call to Pence wherein he pressured Pence to act illegally against his oath. 

Quote:"Did you advise the President that in your professional judgment the Vice President DOES NOT have the power to decide things unilaterally?" Jacob said in a text sent to Eastman.

"He's been so advised," Eastman replied.
ABC news quoting Jan6 hearing transcript

This stuff is literally the tip of the iceberg though. Tons more out there if you have time to read transcripts.

---