(09-28-2023, 06:23 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(09-28-2023, 01:01 AM)p_rushing Wrote: It won't be a ruling that stands. You can't make up valuations when you don't know what you are doing. The county tax assessment is more than the judge said the property was worth.


Also the banks had no problem with anything, weren't harmed, and still aren't involved because there was nothing wrong.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

Cmon man, they've got him this time.

I'm not so sure they've got him on anything here.  A civil suit brought by the government sounds like a witch-hunt from the start.  Who is the injured party and what are the losses?

Also, if provable, intentional fraud occurred, it hard to see how the banks were not complicit, or, at the least, grossly negligent.  They're required by Federal regulations to obtain independent appraisals and do their own due diligence, beginning at a far lower lending threshold.  In either case, the banks are sitting on the evidence.  If it corroborates Trump's, it blows the State's case out of the water.  If it doesn't, dump their stock, if you're holding any.

---